Blogs

V1 Dashboard: Sign Up | Sign In

The Daily Shakedown

Subscribe: RSS

Wednesday, Nov. 18, 2009

Eau Claire police considering surveillance cameras?

Saw this on the AP news feed, and unless I’m too busy reading Twilight fan fiction blind, I haven’t seen it appear in local media. I excerpt-ize:

  • Eau Clarie's police chief says putting surveillance cameras on some city streets would help deter crime. But opponents don't like the thought of constantly being watched.
  • Chief Jerry Matysik says the cameras could be tried on Water Street, where officers are frequently called because of the number of bars. Matysik says having cameras in plain view could stop some disorderly conduct and fights. Read more.

The article even quotes Jack Gribble of Midwest Tattoo. And it says that Matysik “wants” the cameras installed by 2011 at a cost of $60,000. Really? Anyone else heard anything about this?

posted by Mike Paulus

I Like This

 
Share/Save/Bookmark
 

Comments (22)

pookums
11/20/09

Paranoia = liberty.

Ronin, read this article, it accurately lists what's going on in the U.K. and why I'm so "paranoid".

toddy
11/20/09

Romin, Are we paranoid when we desire to live unfettered by governmental oversight?

My freedom is your paranoia. This is where we've allowed ourselves to be taken by the wide swinging pendulum of governmental "oversight".

Ronin
11/20/09

Sorry, I think you are all paraniod. Oh, Pookums, I wasn't putting words in "your fingers", I was looking for where you draw the line on public and private, or acceptable and unacceptable. They were questions, henseforth the question marks at the end of them.....

pookums
11/19/09

Toddy said:
Pookums, we are amazingly simpatico here. You are sounding more libertarian all the time.


Well, I do lean towards the lower-Left of the Political Compass chart. ;-)

toddy
11/19/09

Pookums, we are amazingly simpatico here. You are sounding more libertarian all the time.

pookums
11/19/09

Ronin said:
So Pookums, how is it any more of a "violation" of our rights, if the same cops that would be(and already are) patroling the street are watching the monitors?


I'll try to put it simply. It's not really legal for the police to follow you around, watching everything you do, without probable cause. This is what I equate ubiquitous police surveillance to. If I private citizen were to do that, it would be cause for harassment charges and possibly, a burst lip.

Are you saying that store security cameras are a violation of rights?

Stop putting words into my fingers. (Get it? You're typing stuff I didn't type! Ha. ha. ha.)

Seriously though, uh, no, this isn't what I'm saying. Stores aren't considered "public space". Duh.

How about traffic cameras to catch people running red lights? You are in public, and anyone can see you, how can you call it an invasion of privacy???

I didn't say anything about traffic cameras as traffic cameras are only supposed to be triggered when a crime is committed, e.g., running a red light. Interestingly, more and more municipalities are getting rid of those things as well because, well, they suck and they don't work and again, there are privacy issues involved.

Here in these beautiful United State, we have what's called a reasonable expectation of privacy. This means, basically, that we co go about our business with the expectation that people will bugger off and not monitor our actions without a court order. The simple-mided belief that this sort of surveillance is justified and acceptable because it'll help stop vandalism and other sorts of petty crime is reprehensible at the very least.

I tell you what, let me know where you live so I can set up a camera across the street to monitor your comings and goings. I mean, if you're not doing anything illegal, what do you have to fear, right? It's a public space, right?

toddy
11/19/09

Twelve states have already outlawed these cash cows. Numerous studies have shown them to have no impact on crime prevention. The State of Texas law is considered the clearest and most readable. Another money grab by our ever-enlarging governmental bureaucracy.

pearlsbeforeswine
11/19/09

SciFi ... We could deter crimes before they exist/// Whoa >> Someone has been watching Tom Cruise movies??? ............
If there was a real need, if we were a real crime area, if we could offset costs by eliminating some patrol, if we actually had crime to watch.... rather than a few adolescent drunks acting up.... Don't banks have those cameras??? They don't seem to be detering much there these days. .... Maybe we could put the videos on YouTube ... that would be a less expensive deterent.

Ronin
11/19/09

So Pookums, how is it any more of a "violation" of our rights, if the same cops that would be(and already are) patroling the street are watching the monitors? Are you saying that store security cameras are a violation of rights? How about traffic cameras to catch people running red lights? You are in public, and anyone can see you, how can you call it an invasion of privacy???
To me, I think it will help with the vandalism and property damage, since they will have a face to put with the crime. It might even keep the court fees down, since the person will know they are on camera, and have no chance to fight it.

Jammer
11/18/09

Pookums,

At first I thought your statement was kind of misleading. But, I did a quick google search and I think other people should check this page out:
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/police-camera-crime.htm

So, would a camera prevent violent crime with drunks? These studies also said the cost was in the millions - would the $60,000 price tag for ECPD be worth it, since it's considerably lower?

And an even better question: how is this integrated in to the ECPD's on-the-ground patrols?

Funny story: When I was in high school, they installed cameras in the cafeteria that would beam images/video out to squad cars in the area. They actually would catch people stealing food this way. So that guy stealing the $3 french fries almost made up for the price of the cameras, I'm sure...

MikePaulus
11/18/09

Yep. Too much Twilight fan fiction.

pookums
11/18/09

Yeah, great idea. It's a pretty well known fact that these sorts of cameras don't do shit to deter crime and only serve to violate the rights of everyone in public spaces. Why not have a couple of cops walk the beat like they used to? You know, those same fatasses that'll be monitoring the television screens?

George
11/18/09

Maybe it was harder to find because they did the story a couple weeks ago...

http://www.wqow.com/Global/story.asp?S=11459658

GiffsRiffs
11/18/09

You asked where the coverage is: The Leader-Telegram was way over that story three weeks ago:
http://shar.es/azIug

Jammer
11/18/09

Just put a camera outside the Pickle and Shenans. That's really all you need.

Also, keep in mind the potential that it may make court cases go a lot quicker, which has the potential to cut costs over time.

crazy
11/18/09

$60,000??? Why not just hire a cop and give him a horse to patrol up and down the street, it would cost less and look way cooler. Also, what will all the cops that just park their cars and sit on Water Street do?

Trent
11/18/09

If they go ahead with this, they should make it budget neutral (or better yet, positive) by laying off $60,000+ worth of policeman.

I feel over-policed already, but at least cameras aren't officious, self-righteous busybodies.

hairy
11/18/09

Assuming drunk people are causing all the crime on water street ... I really don't think a drunk person cares about cameras. So, as a deterrent, cameras won't be helping at all. Wow, $60,000?

PCobbs
11/18/09

Seriously, I don't know what people are whining about. They are already under surveillance pretty much wherever they go. We all sold our freedom and souls to Big Brother years ago. Our only advantage is that the government is usually too incompetent and bureaucratic to prosecute everyone.

Stasia
11/18/09

Why not put up fake cameras with battery-operating blinking lights, and let the "criminals" wonder whether they're being monitored, at a cost of, oh, maybe $300?

Or permanent signs indicating monitoring?

Why not PATROL the area more if they're being called there so much? Would a regular weekend-night drive-by cost that much, since they're getting called to the area anyway? How 'bout a foot officer?

MikePaulus
11/18/09

Ah! Thanks! I knew there had t be coverage somewhere. WEAU has much cooler tattoo artist quotations. And! They quote Matysik about cameras in downtown EC.

goob
11/18/09

WEAU and WQOW ran stories. Here is a link to WEAU because it's easier to link to. Hear that WQOW, easier to link to....

http://www.weau.com/news/headlines/70338882.html

Post a Comment

 

Create an account or login to skip entering your name and email.

Allowed HTML tags: b,i,a[href],strong

Notify me of new comments via e-mail

 

Prove you are human. Type the numbers. Click the image for a new one if you cannot read it. Create an account or login and you will not have to do this.

 
Blogs / Most Liked

Monday, Mar. 1, 2010

Renaissance Faire returneth!

The new owners say the Chippewa Falls location could be used for the Ren Faire plus a Wild West Show, a Halloween Scream Fest, and more.

Comments (2)

Wednesday, Mar. 3, 2010

Solid Gold doing solid work

In case you didn’t know, former Eau Clairian Adam Hurlburt heads up the guitarin’ operations for super popular Minneapolis band Solid Gold.

Comments (1)

Monday, Mar. 8, 2010

Pecking Away at Convention

“E-CLUCK” stands for Eau Claire Leaders for Urban Chicken Keeping. The group is still in its infancy – more of a discussion than an organization ...

Comments (1)

Thursday, Mar. 11, 2010

Robert De Niro to coach the Packers

Apparently, the “You talkin’ to me?” guy is going to play Sir Vince Lombardi in a movie to be appropriately titled “Lombardi.”

Comments (0)

 
You / Reader Comments

Indeed!

MikePaulus
03/11/10

from blog post: Those darn Russian hackerz

FYI - In the last sentence you used the word "whole" where I believe you in...

Guest
03/11/10

from blog post: Those darn Russian hackerz

agreed, meridene's meatloaf set was the cats pajamas~

jimmypull
03/11/10

from blog post: Show Review: Decadent Cabaret
(Night 2)

Well I'll be. You sir have just made my day. Excuse me, I'm going down to v...

Aryn Widule
03/11/10

from blog post: Fancy pants new cameras to help you drive better!

Thanks Mike! I needed that. And Ben, thanks a lot as well!

Trev4
03/11/10

from blog post: Show Review: Decadent Cabaret
(Night 2)

To be fair, hammer, the city is providing zero dollars on this project. It'...

Trevor Kupfer
03/11/10

from blog post: Water Street, police nix beach launch in favor of lookout deck

I'm not sure about this, I'm a huge fan of sitting on the ground to check o...

hammer
03/11/10

from blog post: Water Street, police nix beach launch in favor of lookout deck

Seriously, Trevor... one of the best sets of the weekend!

Ben
03/11/10

from blog post: Show Review: Decadent Cabaret
(Night 2)

 
V1 Insiders

Insider Giveaway:
Listen up @LongPlay Replay

Win a $50 Gift Certificate from LongPlay Replay

Insider Giveaway:
Treasure hunting at Eclectica

Win a $50 Gift Certificate from Eclectica on Grand

Insider Giveaway:
Unwire yourself @Wireless Outlet

Win a $50 Gift Certificate from Wireless Outlet